The present literature review was conducted in order to investigate the role of Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) in modern public administration. We use data from different academic articles to decompose the value within the framework of this theoretical perspective. In addition to explaining how extend, Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) is crucial in the “information age” and its main factors will be the main priorities of the study. Traditional top-down conceptions of leadership are at best unduly simplistic, as twenty-first-century management continues to stress decentralized organizing structures and co-evolutionary ecologies of enterprises, institutions, and markets. There's also a growing recognition that effective leadership isn't always defined by the leader's symbolic, motivating, or charismatic behaviors. But, if leadership isn't "in" or "done by" a leader, how can we understand what leadership is and where it comes from? A unique method to answering these concerns is based on complexity theory, specifically the idea that leadership emerges from relational interactions among actors. Leadership, in this view, is more than a talent, a transaction, or a symbol; it comes from dynamic relationships. The role of leadership in accelerating those processes in companies where interdependent acts among many persons merge into a collective venture is investigated by "complexity leadership theory." Complexity leadership is a combination of the three forms of leadership described below: (1) administrative leadership based on tight control and a large bureaucratic hierarchy (2) adaptive leadership, which is built on creative issue solution, resonating with changing situations, and learning, and (3) action-centered leadership, which entails crisis decision-making and dynamic productivity.

The following resources are related to this publication by citation.