Your search
Results 376 resources
-
Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use...
-
Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world’s poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to...
-
The United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) aimed to address global challenges to achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals through 12 interdisciplinary research hubs. This research documents key lessons learned around working with Theory of Change (ToC) to guide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) within these complex research for development hubs. Interviews and document reviews were conducted in ten of the research...
-
Research for development (R4D) funding is increasingly expected to demonstrate value for money (VfM). However, the dominance of positivist approaches to evaluating VfM, such as cost-benefit analysis, do not fully account for the complexity of R4D funds and risk undermining efforts to contribute to transformational development. This paper posits an alternative approach to evaluating VfM, using the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund and the Newton Fund as case studies. Based on a...
-
The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D...
-
Research for development (R4D) aims to make a tangible difference to development challenges, but these effects typically take years to emerge. Evaluation (especially impact evaluation) often takes place before there is evidence of development impact. In this paper, we focus on opportunities for assessing the potential for impact at earlier stages in the research and innovation process. We argue that such a focus can help research programme managers and evaluators learn about the...
-
Considering Systems Thinking (ST) as a cognitive skill can create greater acceptability of and openness to the discipline from practitioners and researchers outside operations research and management science. Rather than associating ST with frameworks and methodologies, ST as a cognitive skill can help popularize and democratize the discipline. This paper highlights how the conceptual lens of Holistic Flexibility can help practitioners deploy ST as a cognitive skill without the application...
-
Motivation This paper explores adaptive approaches to development programmes that aim at improving service provision in underperforming sectors in fragile and conflict affected states (FCAS). It does this through a case study of the Integrated Maji Infrastructure and Governance Initiative for eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo's (IMAGINE) public-private partnership model for water provision. Purpose The processes and decisions that culminated in IMAGINE's model emphasize the need...
-
Diverse approaches to promoting disability inclusive employment aim to transform workplaces into truly inclusive environments, usually with intervention strategies targeting two main groups: employers and jobseekers with disabilities. However, they do not always consider other relevant stakeholders or address the relationships and interactions between diverse actors in the wider social ecosystem. These approaches often neglect deeper ‘vexing’ difficulties which block progress towards...
-
Political economy analysis (PEA) has been advanced as critical to understanding the political dimensions of policy change processes. However, political economy (PE) is not a theory on its own but draws on several concepts. Nannini et al, in concert with other scholars, emphasise that politics is characterised by conflict, contestation and negotiation over interests, ideas and power as various agents attempt to influence their context. This commentary reflects how Nannini et al wrestled with...
-
Doing development differently rests on deliberate efforts to reflect and learn, not just about what programmes are doing and achieving, but about how they are working. This is particularly important for an action research programme like Child Labour: Action- Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA), which is implemented by a consortium of organisations from across the research and development spectrum, during a rapidly changing global pandemic. Harnessing the potential...
-
Introduction:The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a complex-aware monitoring and evaluation tool, widely recognized for various adaptive management purposes. The documentation of practical examples using the MSC technique for an ongoing monitoring purpose is limited. We aim to fill the current gap by documenting and sharing the experience and lessons learned of The Challenge Initiative (TCI), which is scaling up evidence-based family planning (FP) and adolescent and youth sexual...
-
The positive deviance approach in international development scales practices and strategies of positively-deviant individuals and groups: those who are able to achieve significantly better development outcomes than their peers despite having similar resources and challenges. This approach relies mainly on traditional data sources (e.g. surveys and interviews) for identifying those positive deviants and for discovering their successful solutions. The growing availability of non-traditional...
-
This article explores the challenges of monitoring and evaluating politically informed and adaptive programmes in the international development field. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of some specific evaluation methodologies which have been suggested as particularly appropriate for these kinds of programmes based on scholarly literature and the practical experience of the authors in using them. We suggest that those methods which assume generative causality are particularly well...
-
Motivation In the last decade, a movement formed around making aid delivery more adaptive, relying on principles such as context sensitivity, flexibility, and ownership. The approaches seem promising for civil society organizations (CSOs) to fulfil their mission of fostering social transformation. While several donor agencies have started engaging with such approaches, the authors hardly see their political implications in practice. Purpose The article aims to provide evidence on an adaptive...
-
Collective impact efforts must prioritize working together in more relational ways to find systemic solutions to social problems. Sometimes we lose sight of a simple truth about systems: They are made up of people. Despite all of the frameworks and tools at our disposal and all of our learning as a field of practice, purely technical, rational approaches to systems change will not make much of a dent in shifting power or altering our most deeply held beliefs. If most collective impact...
-
Issues of power are not new to program evaluation. What is new is a consideration of how programming uses insights into incentives that shape and adapt implementation. How should one evaluate in a way that explicitly assesses the ways in which a program considers power? One of the innovative topics deriving from the democracy and governance space is the approach of thinking and working politically (TWP) which is seeing increased use in development programming. TWP suggests different mental...
-
Evaluators who take a complexity-aware approach must consider tradeoffs related to theoretical parsimony, falsifiability, and measurement validity. These tradeoffs may be particularly pronounced with ex-post evaluation designs in which program theory development and monitoring frameworks are often completed before the evaluator is engaged. In this chapter, we argue that theory-based evaluation (TBE) approaches can address unique ex-post evaluation challenges that complexity-aware evaluation...
-
This chapter examines good practices in implementing effective Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) systems within complex international development Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance (DRG) programs, which are characterized by challenges of non-linearity, limited evidence of theories of change, and contextual and politically contingent nature of outcomes. The chapter presents three cases of MEL systems in complex projects implemented by Pact across distinct and diverse operating...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(135)
- Adaptive Learning (20)
- Adaptive Management (32)
- Adaptive Rigour (1)
- Agile & Lean approaches (20)
- Design Thinking / HCD (23)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (7)
-
Other sectors
(9)
- Environmental (6)
- Logistics & Product Development (2)
- Sport (1)
- Participation (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (3)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (3)
- Positive Deviance (3)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (33)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (6)
- Cases (17)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(12)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- China (2)
- DFAT (Australia) (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (3)
- GIZ (Germany) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (2)
- USAID - CLA (1)
- World Bank (2)
-
Geography
(20)
-
Africa
(10)
- Central Africa (1)
- Eastern Africa (7)
-
Northern Africa
(1)
- Egypt (1)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
- West Africa (3)
-
Americas
(1)
- Central America (1)
-
Asia
(13)
-
Eastern Asia
(5)
- China (5)
-
South-eastern Asia
(4)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Lao People's Democratic Republic (1)
- Viet Nam (1)
-
Southern Asia
(4)
- Bangladesh (4)
- Nepal (2)
-
Eastern Asia
(5)
- Europe (1)
-
Africa
(10)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(84)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- Action Research (2)
- After Action Reviews (2)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (10)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (2)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Knowledge Management (3)
- Logical Framework (8)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (4)
- MEL in International Development (7)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (2)
- Participatory Evaluation (6)
- Policy Scientific Approach (1)
- Portfolio Management (2)
- Positive Deviance (1)
- Power Analysis (1)
- Process Tracing (5)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Rubrics (1)
- Scenario Planning (2)
- Systemic Action Research (1)
- Systems Mapping (1)
- Tech 4 MEL (1)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (15)
- Trans-disciplinary Research (1)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (1)
- Practical (6)
-
Sectors [+]
(135)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (23)
- Children (2)
- Citizen Engagement (21)
- Economic development (1)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (16)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (1)
- Governance and Accountability (35)
- Health (4)
- Inclusion/Disability (1)
- Innovation in Development (6)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (1)
- Knowledge to Practice (9)
- Locally led development (2)
- NGOs (1)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Research for Development (R4D) (6)
- Social Accountability (38)
-
Tech in Development
(11)
- Appropriate Tech (2)
- Tools (2)
- Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(27)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
- 1948 (1)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (2)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (2)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(1)
- 1974 (1)
- Between 1980 and 1989 (8)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (13)
-
Between 1940 and 1949
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2023
(346)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (53)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (248)
- Between 2020 and 2023 (45)
- Unknown (3)