Your search
Results 263 resources
-
MAVC's Duncan Edwards reflects on the first in a series of thematic discussions led by the Institute of Development Studies. The second of two posts.
-
Part of a sequenced learning process for MAVC's Research and Evidence Component, the summary of a thematic discussion led by researcher Evangelia Berdou.
-
Part of a sequenced learning process for MAVC's Research and Evidence Component, the summary of a thematic discussion led by researcher Rosemary McGee.
-
An outline of Making All Voices Count's Research & Evidence component led by the Institute of Development Studies.
-
Collaborative Outcomes Reporting (COR) is a participatory approach to impact evaluation based around a performance story that presents evidence of how a program has contributed to outcomes and impacts, that is then reviewed by both technical experts and program stakeholders, which may include community members. Collaborative Outcomes Reporting (COR) is a participatory approach to impact evaluation based around a performance story that presents evidence of how a program has contributed to...
-
As my inaugural post on my new blog, I thought I would re-post a short piece I wrote earlier this year about foreign aid (original here). Thomas Carothers and Diane de Garamont address this issue i…
-
Staff blogs from the UK Department for International Development. Get real-life perspectives from those on the ground to fight poverty and join in the debate.
-
Outcome mapping (OM) is a methodology for planning, monitoring and evaluating development initiatives in order to bring about sustainable social change. As the name suggests, its niche is understanding outcomes; the so-called ‘missing-middle’ or ‘black box’ of results that emerge downstream from the initiative’s activities but upstream from longer-term economic, environmental, political or demographic changes. At the planning stage, the process of outcome mapping helps a project team or...
-
The Future is OSLO
-
The meteoric rise of "citizen engagement" Almost all development agencies promote some form of citizen engagement and accountability, often framed as 'voice', 'demand-side governance', 'demand for good governance' or 'social accountability'. The current World Bank president, Jim Yong Kim, recently put it that, "citizen voice can be pivotal in providing the demand-side pressure on government, service providers, and organizations such as the World Bank that is needed to encourage full and...
-
This AEA365 blog, written by Lee-Anne Molony a Principal Consultant at Clear Horizon, provides a brief overview on Collaborative Outcomes Reporting (COR).
-
Yesterday, I had the chance to attend the public launch of a new government transparency and accountability funding mechanism – Making All Voices Count. Held at USAID headquarters, the discussion featured a veritable who’s who of open government and transparency practitioners in the Washington area; probably 250 people were packed into the room. (Announcing a …
-
In the last of a series of three blog posts looking at the implications of complexity theory for development, Owen Barder and Ben Ramalingam look at the implications of complexity for the trend towards results-based management in development cooperation. They argue that is a common mistake to see a contradiction between recognising complexity and focusing on results: on the contrary, complexity provides a powerful reason for pursuing the results agenda, but it has to be done in ways which...
-
This webpage from Tamarack Community provides links to audio files of an interview between Mark Cabaj and Michael Patton in which they discuss the topic of development evaluation. This is an "approach that has proven particularly useful and effective at addressing the unique challenges of evaluating the real nature of community change work. Learning Objectives: To deepen appreciation for the role of evaluation and evaluation thinking To explore the distinctions between various types of...
-
The method was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff as an alternative (or supplement) to the Kirkpatrick approach and its derivatives. It is very simple and fast (which is part of it’s appeal) and goes something like this: Step 1. Identify targeted business goals and impact expectations Step 2. Survey a large representative sample of all participants in a program to identify high impact and low impact cases Step 3. Analyze the survey data to identify: a small group of successful...
-
Note: Many thanks to Dave Snowden for his willingness to comment on this article prior to release Because I’m always a little behind the eight-ball, a friend of mine* recently introduced me to the …
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(109)
- Adaptive Learning (10)
- Adaptive Management (36)
- Adaptive Rigour (3)
- Agile & Lean approaches (18)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (4)
- Design Thinking / HCD (3)
- Doing Development Differently (9)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (5)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (1)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (9)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (2)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (2)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (20)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (11)
- Cases (2)
- Courses (1)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(17)
- DFAT (Australia) (4)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (4)
- Irish Aid (2)
- NGO Perspectives (2)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (1)
-
Geography
(4)
-
Africa
(1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
- South Sudan (1)
-
West Africa
(1)
- Mali (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(1)
-
Americas
(1)
-
South America
(1)
- Colombia (1)
-
South America
(1)
-
Asia
(2)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- China (1)
-
Southern Asia
(1)
- Bangladesh (1)
-
Eastern Asia
(1)
- Oceania (1)
-
Africa
(1)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(102)
- After Action Reviews (1)
- Appreciative Inquiry (2)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Causal Mechanisms (2)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Contribution Analysis (2)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (1)
- Developmental Evaluation (2)
- Empowerment Evaluation (2)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Feedback Systems (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (1)
- Innovation History (1)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowledge Management (2)
- Logical Framework (1)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (4)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (1)
- Outcome Mapping (4)
- Participatory Action Research (1)
- Participatory Evaluation (3)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (1)
- Portfolio Management (3)
- Positive Deviance (2)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (1)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rigour (1)
- Rubrics (6)
- Rules of Thumb (2)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Social Return on Investment (2)
- Success Case Method (3)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systemic Change (4)
- Systems Mapping (3)
- Theory-based evaluations (1)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (10)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (9)
-
Practical
(10)
- Tools (1)
-
Sectors [+]
(51)
- Alternative Development (15)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Citizen Engagement (6)
- Governance and Accountability (15)
- Innovation (in Development) (9)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Knowledge to Practice (3)
- Locally driven development (2)
- Locally led development (1)
- NGOs (3)
- Peace Building (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (1)
- Social Accountability (10)
- Social Protection (1)
- Technology (in Development) (1)