Making adaptive rigour work - Principles and practices for strenghening monitoring, evaluation and learning for adaptive management

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Making adaptive rigour work - Principles and practices for strenghening monitoring, evaluation and learning for adaptive management
Abstract
Adaptive programmes can be accountable, rigorous and high quality in how they use evidence by taking an ’adaptive rigour’ approach. Core development and humanitarian challenges are complex, and require processes of testing, learning and iteration to find solutions – adaptive management offers one approach for this. Yet large bureaucracies and development organisations can have low tolerance for experimentation and learning, and adaptive management can be viewed as an excuse for ‘making things up as you go along’. This briefing from the Global Learning for Adaptive Management (GLAM) initiative argues that adaptive programmes can be accountable, rigorous and high quality in how they use evidence – but this requires rethinking some key assumptions about how they are practised. The paper sets out three key elements of an ‘adaptive rigour’ approach: - Strengthening the quality of monitoring, evaluation and learning data and systems. - Ensuring appropriate investment in monitoring, evaluation and learning across the programme cycle. - Strengthening capacities and incentives to ensure the effective use of evidence and learning as part of decision-making, leading ultimately to improved effectiveness.
Place
London
Institution
ODI/GLAM
Date
2019.04
Language
en
Library Catalogue
Zotero
Citation
Ramalingam, B., Wild, L., & Buffardi, A. L. (2019). Making adaptive rigour work - Principles and practices for strenghening monitoring, evaluation and learning for adaptive management. ODI/GLAM.