Your search
Results 423 resources
-
The CommunityFirst Framework is intended to be implemented by field teams at MSF. The theoretical aspects and evidence presented on the importance of community engagement are intended for all MSF staff seeking to learn more about why and how to shift the way we work with communities as humanitarians. We believe this guideline, and other tools like it (including OCA’s Person-Centred Approach Guidance07, and MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit’s Guidance for Involving Communities08), to be an important...
-
Any mission-focused government should be well equipped to define, from day one, what outcomes it wants to bring about. But radically changing what the government does is only part of the challenge. We also need to change how government does things. The usual methods, we argue in this paper, are too prone to failure and delay. There’s a different approach to public service organisation, one based on multidisciplinary teams, starting with citizen needs, and scaling iteratively by testing...
-
Doing weeknotes brings together various things I’ve written about weeknotes in different places. This text expands on things I wrote in The agile comms handbook, as well as various blog posts. Quite a lot of it is brand new. - Weeknotes for beginners - Why write weeknotes - The weeknotes rules - Weeknotes within the corporate environment - What weeknotes can bring about - Examples of good weeknotes - How to write weeknotes - Weeknotes tips and tricks - Further reading
-
The Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE) programme was a three-year initiative funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) that brought together 20 projects from across the global South to understand the socioeconomic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, improve existing responses, and generate better policy options for recovery. The research covered 42 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to understand the ways in which the pandemic...
-
Organising for Systems Innovation at Scale Our team at Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation have been experimenting with and evolving a Challenge-led Innovation Approach (based on Mission-oriented approaches developed by Mariana Mazzucato at UCL IIPP and others internationally). We are using this approach to guide the way we work internally and engage with our systems innovation partners. We’ve facilitated intensive Re:Treats, worked with government bodies, businesses and civic...
-
This report addresses the well-recognized evidence gap1 on the longer-term impacts created by marketdriven programming; specifically, programming influenced by market systems development (MSD) principles. It does so by presenting the findings of an ex-post study conducted three and a half years after the close of USAID’s Feed the Future Senegal Naatal Mbay Activity (hereafter Naatal Mbay) in 2019. It examines the scale and sustainability of changes resulting from Naatal Mbay’s introduction...
-
DT Global is proud to introduce our new Guidance Note: Practical Introduction to Adaptive Management There is a growing consensus around adaptive management as an effective (even necessary) approach when programs are tackling complex development problems. While there is no standard definition of adaptive management, there is general agreement that such programs need to routinely engage with and respond to program context; constantly test what works in that context; and adjust approaches,...
-
This updated guide provides practical guidance to practitioners in the human rights sector and beyond on how to integrate Applied Political Economy Analysis
-
What problem is the KRT model trying to solve? For workforces that experience continuous staff turnover, the lack of systematic knowledge transfer can often lead to: - Loss of programmatic momentum, - Duplication of efforts and frustration, and - Wasted time and resources. The Knowledge Retention and Transfer (KRT) model provides tools, processes, and practices to individuals, teams, offices, and organizations to improve knowledge handover, which in turn improves efficiency and programmatic and operational learning.
-
Many readers recognise and understand that complex is about as simple as it gets for major policy and management. This guide is for those unwilling in the Anthropocene to shrink back into the older platitudes about ‘keep it simple’ and ‘not to worry, we’ll scale up the analysis later on’. This guide offers key concepts, methods, counternarratives, and analogies that recast major policy and management issues in ways that do not deny their complexity but help render them more tractable for action.
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
A resource designed to help organisations, teams and individuals manage innovation journeys responsibly and successfully. We have partnered with MIT D-Lab to develop a new resource to drive greater diversity and inclusion within project design and implementation. The Participation for Humanitarian Innovation (PfHI) toolkit sets out a robust approach to setting expectations for and monitoring the degree of participation within research and innovation projects for, with, and by people...
-
Addressing 21st century development challenges requires investments in innovation, including the use of new approaches and technologies. Currently, many development organisations prioritise investments in isolated innovation pilots that leverage a specific approach or technology rather than pursuing a strategic approach to expand the organisation’s toolbox with innovations that have proven their comparative advantage over what is currently used. This Working Paper addresses this challenge of...
-
Terms of reference (TORs) play an outsized role in driving scalable educational programming. These procurement documents shape, constrain, and signal programme priorities and possibilities. Successful funders and implementers across the globe hold rich processual knowledge about this documentation, which they use to draft and assess TORs. This project explores such best-practice knowledge around TOR review, seeking to support the design and implementation of educational programmes that can...
-
The global Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) Community of Practice (CoP), the Washington DC TWP CoP, and USAID organised a webinar on 5 December 2022 to take stock of how USAID and its partners have used PEA to inform programme strategy, design and implementation, and support TWP. This paper synthesises the key points arising from the webinar, including observations on the impacts, opportunities, challenges, and prospects for PEA/TWP to become more deeply adopted and sustained as a...
-
Nearly all challenges in international development tend to be complex because they depend on constantly evolving human behaviour, systems, and contexts, involving multiple actors, entities, and processes. As a result, both the discovery and scaling of innovations to address challenges in development often involve changes in system behaviour or even system-level transformation. This is rarely a linear process over time and can result in unexpected outcomes. Existing evaluation techniques...
-
The conversation on adaptive management has grown fast amongst development actors. These conversations often focus on designing, commissioning, and managing large-scale development programmes. Exactly how this impacts the frontline, the implementers, and day-to-day project delivery is still being debated. Yet, perspectives drawn directly from practice are often largely missing within these debates. This paper is written by two development practitioners. Through this paper, we reflect on the...
-
The Two Loop model is a nonlinear theory of change based upon the ideas of living systems created by Margaret Wheatley & Deborah Frieze. It provides us with insight into the simultaneous growth and decline process that are underway within a system during a transition period. In this way, it provides a heuristic for us to better try and recognize and connect the past to the future during a change process. It likewise gives us the possibility to try and come to some consensus about where we...
-
This guide is adapted from work by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) with inputs from members of the Thinking and Working Politically Community of Practice (TWP CoP). It outlines how to understand and use a set of analytical tools that are collectively known as Political Economy Analysis (PEA). The guide aims to equip practitioners to act in an informed manner, given that development objectives are invariably politically complex, and entail engaging with...
-
So you have just hear about systems thinking and systems innovation and are keen to know more, Ok sparky let's get started.We have structured all the content into four main areas that we think you ...
Explore
Theme
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
- Adaptive Learning (43)
- Adaptive Management (173)
- Adaptive Rigour (4)
- Agile & Lean approaches (22)
- Capacity WORKS (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (27)
- Design Thinking / HCD (33)
- Doing Development Differently (12)
- Global Delivery Initiative (3)
- Human Learning Systems (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (12)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (4)
- Other Adaptive approaches (9)
-
Other sectors
(6)
- Government (1)
- Military (2)
- Organizational Management (2)
- Philosophical roots (1)
- Participation (4)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (15)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (18)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (5)
- Results Based Management (11)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (73)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (47)
- Cases (81)
- Courses (7)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(101)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- DANIDA - Danish International Development Agency (1)
- DCED - Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (2)
- DFAT (Australia) (4)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (27)
- GIZ (Germany) (7)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- ILO (1)
- Irish Aid (1)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- NGO Perspectives (14)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (13)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (4)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (1)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (4)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (2)
- USAID (16)
- World Bank (9)
-
Geography
(76)
-
Africa
(53)
-
Central Africa
(3)
- Angola (1)
- Cameroon (1)
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (1)
-
Eastern Africa
(18)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Kenya (2)
- Malawi (1)
- Mozambique (5)
- Rwanda (2)
- Somalia (1)
- Somaliland (1)
- South Sudan (1)
- Tanzania (5)
- Uganda (3)
- Zambia (1)
- Zimbabwe (3)
- Northern Africa (1)
-
Southern Africa
(3)
- South Africa (3)
-
West Africa
(38)
- Liberia (2)
- Nigeria (31)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (4)
-
Central Africa
(3)
-
Americas
(4)
-
Central America
(2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (1)
-
North America
(1)
- Canada (1)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(2)
-
Asia
(22)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
- Cambodia (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Myanmar (5)
- Philippines (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Timor Leste (1)
-
Southern Asia
(11)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Bangladesh (4)
- India (2)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (4)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
South-eastern Asia
(8)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- United Kingdom (2)
-
Western Europe
(2)
- Netherlands (1)
- Switzerland (1)
-
Northern Europe
(2)
- Many geographies (2)
-
Oceania
(2)
- Australia and New Zealand (1)
- Melanesia (1)
-
Africa
(53)
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
(110)
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (2)
- After Action Reviews (4)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Desk based research/lit review (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (1)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (3)
- Ex-post Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (3)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (2)
- Indicator-based approaches (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (2)
- Institutional Histories (1)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (4)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (2)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (6)
- Most Significant Change (1)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (1)
- Outcome Harvesting (2)
- Outcome Mapping (3)
- Participatory Action Research (6)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (2)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (8)
- Portfolio Management (8)
- Process Tracing (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Realist Evaluation (1)
- Rubrics (2)
- Scenario Planning (1)
- SenseMaker (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (1)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Surveys (1)
- Systemic Change (25)
- Systems Mapping (2)
- Theory-based evaluations (2)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (8)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (1)
- Value for Money (5)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (5)
-
Practical
(71)
- Tools (4)
-
Sectors [+]
(129)
- Advocacy and Activism (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (18)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (3)
- Citizen Engagement (5)
- Climate Change (4)
- Economic development (9)
- Education (4)
- Environmental Management (5)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (7)
- Governance and Accountability (21)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (5)
-
Innovation (in Development)
(12)
- Funding (1)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (11)
- Institutional Reform (4)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally driven development (5)
- Locally led development (2)
- NGOs (15)
- Organizational Change (8)
- Pastoralism (1)
- Peace Building (4)
- Scaling up / Propagating (13)
- Social Accountability (11)
- Technology (in Development) (13)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(6)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1989 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (5)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2024
(417)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (18)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (285)
- Between 2020 and 2024 (113)
-
Between 2030 and 2024
(1)
- 2034 (1)