Your search
Results 294 resources
-
This learning paper highlights how elements of outcome mapping were used by Save the Children Sweden in a project (2018-2020) that supports adolescents, affected by the Syria crisis, to become more resilient. The paper first outlines how the spheres of influence framework has been applied to develop an actor focused theory of change. It then describes how progress markers, as an alternative to SMART indicators, were formulated to monitor the programme’s results. The paper also outlines how...
-
Many education systems in low- and middle-income countries are experiencing a learning crisis. Many efforts to address this crisis do not account for the system features of education, meaning that they fail to consider the ways that interactions and feedback loops produce outcomes. Thinking through the feedback relationships that produce the education system can be challenging. The RISE Education Systems Framework, which is sufficiently structured to give boundaries to the analysis but...
-
This learning paper provides guidance to humanitarian innovators on how to use evidence to enable and drive adoption of innovation. Innovation literature and practice show time and time again that it is difficult to scale innovations. Even when an innovation is demonstrably impactful, better than the existing solution and good value for money, it does not automatically get adopted or used in mainstream humanitarian programming. Why do evidence-based innovations face difficulties in scaling...
-
The enthusiasm for the potential of RCTs in development rests in part on the assumption that the use of the rigorous evidence that emerges from an RCT (or from a small set of studies identified as rigorous in a “systematic” review) leads to the adoption of more effective policies, programs or projects. However, the supposed benefits of using rigorous evidence for “evidence based” policy making depend critically on the extent to which there is external validity. If estimates of causal impact...
-
This document introduces some of the key concepts of theory-based approaches to evaluation. It is hoped that readers will be encouraged by the information and advice provided in this document and will explore the use (e.g., through pilot evaluations) of theory-based approaches to evaluation in a federal setting. To support this, Sections 1.0 to 8.0 of the document describe the general application of theory-based approaches to evaluation, and Sections 9.0 and 10.0 discuss the potential...
-
This Green Paper intends to review key elements of the problem that Development actors will confront as a new decade opens up ahead of us. It will articulate a solution that we believe should become an inherent feature of Development programs and initiatives. This is the outcome of an intense period of experiences and reflections in the Development space across different geographies and institutional mandates and activities, during which the Foundation has collaborated with institutions such...
-
This guide has been developed to help build confidence and capability, distilling useful tips and considerations that may help teams think through programme delivery issues and interpret elements of the PrOF Rules. This PrOF Guide lays out: - The definition of beneficiary engagement. - The case for beneficiary engagement. - FCDO’s approach to beneficiary engagement. - Practical tips for how to integrate beneficiary engagement throughout the programme cycle, including guiding questions to...
-
- The United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO)’s standard economy, efficiency, effectiveness/cost-effectiveness and equity (4E) framework is still relevant for approaching, measuring and managing value for money (VfM) for adaptive programmes. • However, this framework needs to be reframed to capture and incentivise flexibility, learning and adaptation. • VfM appraisal and reporting should be done in a way that draws on beneficiary feedback and informs good...
-
To mark 20 years of Outcome Mapping, this paper presents the core principles and concepts that are foundational to using the approach. It also presents a set of guiding practices to support transformative change. The OMLC Stewards presented the paper at a special webinar on 29th April 2021 - see the link below for the recording.
-
Essential points for practitioners and donors • Mediation offers a cost-effective and proven method for resolving armed conflict. Between 1985 and 2015, 75 per cent of armed conflicts in the world were resolved through agreement rather than by force. In most cases these processes will have involved third party facilitation or support. • Professional mediators understand the high stakes involved in their work to prevent, mitigate and resolve armed conflict. In addition, they and their...
-
The Cynefin Centre’s Citizen Engagement & Democratic Innovation programme provides tools for collective sense-making in the areas of community development and youth work; civic engagement and democratic innovation; collaborative service/policy design and evaluation; housing/tenant engagement; futures and planning; shared learning and peer to peer knowledge exchange.
-
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document is written for Small Foundation network partners. It accompanies Network Partner Evaluation Toolkit, which outlines four evaluation tools that Small Foundation is encouraging, and supporting, its network partners to use to improve their operations and, ultimately, increase their impact. This FAQ document answers typical questions about these evaluation tools and provides additional detailed recommendations for how network coordinators can...
-
Development cooperation has spent decades wrangling over the merits, evidence, and implications of what we may term “the learning hypothesis”: the idea that increased knowledge by development organisations must logically lead to increased effectiveness in the performance of their development activities. Organisations of all stripes have built research and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) departments, adopted a multitude of knowledge management systems and tools, and tinkered with...
-
What can middle-level theory do? Middle-level theory (MLT) has several uses in development planning and evaluation. It helps predict whether a programme can be expected to work in a new setting. It offers insights into what design features are needed for success. It provides invaluable information for monitoring to see if the programme is on track and to fix problems that arise. It reveals the causal processes and related assumptions to be tested in an evaluation and helps identify...
-
This paper lays out a series of steps people can take to create the new systems we need to meet shared, public challenges. Systems are ubiquitous and powerful. We rely on them to support our daily lives: every time we turn on a tap, flick a switch for electricity, drop our child at school, jump on a bus or visit a doctor we rely on a wider system. There is a widespread sense, among decision makers and citizens that in the coming decades society will need not just new products, software and...
-
There is a glaring gap and compelling need for approaches and methods that realign to new rigour through timeliness, cost-effectiveness, relevance and being actionable. Over the past few years, the Sanitation Learning Hub, in collaboration with the Government of India, Praxis, WSSCC and WaterAid India, have been developing Rapid Action Learning approaches. Multiple approaches have been trialled, with flexible formats, but the essential criteria is that learning is timely, relevant and...
-
Systemcraft is our applied framework to help leaders and organisations get started and keep going when faced with complex problems. It is built on our practical experience. It draws on a broad body of research, action and theory from the worlds of complexity thinking, systems theory, adaptive management, leadership development, social movements, development theory and beyond. Systemcraft has been designed to make systems thinking something any leader can apply when they find themselves faced...
-
This paper probes trends in the use of big data by a community of early adopters working in monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning (MERL) in the development and humanitarian sectors. Qualitative analysis was conducted on data from MERL Tech conference records and key informant interviews. Findings indicate that MERL practitioners are in a fragmented, experimental phase, with use and application of big data varying widely, accompanied by shifting terminologies. We take an in-depth...
-
Emerging technology is making monitoring, evaluation, research and learning (MERL) more precise and enriching data. However, this evolution is so rapid that it can be difficult to stay informed about the field overall. This paper presents examples of emerging technology that are most often used in MERL for development programs, describes the pros and cons of their use, and discusses technology and ethics concerns that practitioners should keep in mind. The paper covers new types of data...
Explore
Theme
-
MEL4 Adaptive Management
- Action Inquiry/Collective Leadership (4)
- After Action Reviews (5)
- Appreciative Inquiry (1)
- Beneficiary Assessment/Engagement (8)
- Capacity Development (1)
- Case Study (4)
- Causal Mechanisms (1)
- Circular charts applications (radar, pie, sunburst, spiderweb, orbic, etc) (1)
- Context Monitoring (1)
- Contribution Analysis (5)
- Critical Friends (1)
- Critical Systems Heuristics (3)
- Democratic Evaluation (2)
- Desk based research/lit review (2)
- Developmental Evaluation (8)
- Diaries (1)
- Empowerment Evaluation (1)
- Ethnography / Rapid Ethnography (2)
- Evaluability assessment (2)
- Evaluating Multi-project programmes (5)
- Ex-post Evaluation (3)
- Feedback Systems (3)
- Focus Group Discussions (1)
- Horizontal Evaluation (1)
- Impact evaluation (7)
- Impact Oriented Monitoring and Evaluation System (3)
- Indicator-based approaches (4)
- Innovation History (1)
- Innovation System Analysis (3)
- Institutional Histories (2)
- Knowing Unknowns (1)
- Knowledge Management (5)
- Logical Framework (5)
- Mapping Visualization Methods (3)
- MEL Bricolage (1)
- MEL in International Development (12)
- Most Significant Change (4)
- Narrative Based Approaches (2)
- Network Analysis (2)
- Outcome Harvesting (9)
- Outcome Mapping (18)
- Participatory Action Research (10)
- Participatory Evaluation (10)
- Participatory Learning and Action - PLA (5)
- Participatory Rural Appraisal - PRA, RRA (1)
- Peers/Peer-Group Review (2)
- Political Economy Analysis (12)
- Political Sentiment Analysis (PSA) (1)
- Portfolio Management (11)
- Positive Deviance (4)
- Post Project Evaluations (1)
- Process Tracing (3)
- Public Management Theory (1)
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (4)
- Qualitative data analysis and grounded theory (1)
- Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (8)
- Realist Evaluation (4)
- Remote Monitoring (1)
- Rigour (2)
- Rubrics (6)
- Scenario Planning (3)
- SenseMaker (4)
- Social Return on Investment (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (2)
- Stakeholder Feedback (2)
- Strategy testing (2)
- Success Case Method (1)
- Surveys (2)
- Sustainability (3)
- Systemic Change (25)
- Systems Mapping (4)
- Tech 4 MEL (4)
- Theory-based evaluations (4)
- TOC (Theory of Change) (30)
- Trust-based evaluation (/philanthropy /learning) (2)
- Utilisation focused evaluation (3)
- Value for Investment (3)
- Value for Money (7)
-
Adaptive Approaches [+]
(112)
- Adaptive Learning (18)
- Adaptive Management (45)
- Adaptive Rigour (2)
- Agile & Lean approaches (3)
- CLA (Collaborating Learning Adapting) (9)
- Design Thinking / HCD (2)
- Doing Development Differently (1)
- MSD - Market Systems Development (8)
- Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships (1)
- Other Adaptive approaches (2)
-
Other sectors
(2)
- Military (2)
- Participation (2)
- PDIA (Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation) (1)
- PEA (Political Economy Analysis) (7)
- Positive Deviance & 2 loops model (1)
- Results Based Management (1)
- Systemcraft (1)
- Systems Thinking / Complexity (35)
- TWP (Thinking & Working Politically) (8)
- Cases (33)
-
Development Actors Perspectives
(53)
- AFD (Agence Française de Développement) (1)
- Canada - GAC & IDRC (1)
- FCDO/DFID (UK) (13)
- G7 (1)
- GIZ (Germany) (6)
- Hivos - Netherlands (1)
- Irish Aid (2)
- KOICA (Korea's International Co-operation Agency) (1)
- NGO Perspectives (14)
- OECD/DAC - Results Based Management (2)
- Private Companies - Development Industry (3)
- Private Donors (OSF, Hewlett...) (1)
- SDC - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (2)
- SIDA - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (3)
- UNDP, UN Global Pulse, UN... (3)
- USAID (9)
-
Geography
(33)
-
Africa
(19)
- Central Africa (2)
- Eastern Africa (13)
- Northern Africa (2)
-
Southern Africa
(1)
- South Africa (1)
-
West Africa
(12)
- Benim (1)
- Niger (4)
- Nigeria (5)
- Senegal (1)
- Sierra Leone (1)
-
Americas
(5)
-
Central America
(4)
- Ecuador (2)
- El Salvador (1)
- Guatemala (2)
- Mexico (3)
- South America (3)
-
Central America
(4)
-
Asia
(18)
- South-eastern Asia (3)
-
Southern Asia
(12)
- Bangladesh (7)
- India (1)
- Nepal (7)
- Pakistan (3)
- Sri Lanka (1)
-
Western Asia
(3)
- Israel (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Lebanon (1)
- State of Palestine (1)
- Syrian Arab Republic (1)
-
Europe
(4)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
- Spain (1)
-
Western Europe
(3)
- Germany (3)
-
Southern Europe
(1)
-
Africa
(19)
- Networks and Communities of Practice (3)
-
Practical
(42)
- Tools (5)
-
Sectors [+]
(75)
- Advocacy and Activism (2)
- Agriculture (1)
- Alternative Development (6)
- Cash Trasfers (1)
- Children (8)
- Citizen Engagement (3)
- Climate Change (2)
- Combatting violent extremism (1)
- Economic development (7)
- Education (3)
- Employment (1)
- Environmental Management (1)
- Fragile and Conflict Aflicted Settings (7)
- Gender (3)
- Governance and Accountability (14)
- Health (2)
- Humanitarian Aid (4)
- Innovation (in Development) (6)
- Institutional Capacity & Change (2)
- Knowledge to Practice (5)
- Locally driven development (2)
- NGOs (4)
- Organizational Change (4)
- Peace Building (2)
- Scaling up / Propagating (5)
- Social Accountability (4)
- Technology (in Development) (1)
- Waste Management (1)
Resource type
Publication year
- Between 1900 and 1999 (11)
- Between 2000 and 2024 (283)